---
title: "Case Studies | Label"
description: "Real FATCA & CRS results from banks, funds and administrators on Label — measured in time saved, rejection rates and operating cost."
url: "https://website.labeltech.io/case-studies/"
locale: "en"
---

*Case Studies*

# Proof, measured in numbers

Real results from banks, funds and administrators who moved FATCA & CRS onto Label. Clients kept confidential; outcomes are not.

| Metric | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Assets reported on Label | €500B+ |
| Financial institutions | 8,000+ |
| XML rejection rate | 0% |
| Penalties incurred | 0 |

## A mid-market fund cut data-collection time by 90% — and never chased a form again

*Investment fund*

Facing a growing LP base and manual, spreadsheet-driven onboarding, the fund moved investor self-certification and FATCA & CRS reporting to Label's platform.

| Metric | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Less data-collection time | 90% |
| Higher LP response rate | 70% |
| XML rejection rate | 0% |
| Missed deadlines | 0 |

- Digital self-certification for all LPs
- Automated TIN & form validation
- Full audit trail for every filing

> Compliance went from a quarterly fire drill to something we barely think about. The LP experience alone paid for it.

— Fund CFO

## An administrator halved operating cost after switching from its previous provider

*Fund administrator*

Managing FATCA & CRS across dozens of client funds, the administrator consolidated everything onto Label — standardising workflows and eliminating per-filing surprises.

| Metric | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Lower operating cost vs prior provider | 50% |
| Client funds consolidated | 12+ |
| Penalties or rejections | 0 |
| Platform for the whole book | 1 |

- Standardised workflow across every fund
- Single multi-jurisdiction deadline view
- Fixed-fee, no per-filing surprises

> We took on new mandates without adding compliance headcount. Label is the reason those deals were profitable.

— Director, fund administrator

## More stories

| Story | Result | Detail |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Bank: A bank moved millions of accounts onto Label with maker-checker controls and kept accuracy at 99.9%. | 6M+ | Accounts processed |
| Fund: A fund automated remediation and withholding, freeing its team from the annual reporting crunch entirely. | 80% | Time saved |
| Administrator: An administrator eliminated XML rejections across every client jurisdiction in its first cycle on Label. | 0% | Rejection rate |

## Your numbers could be the next case study.

Book a call and we'll model the cost and time savings for your exact setup.

- [Book a call](/contact/)